Evidence standards
We prefer primary documents for laws and technical explanations. Supplied screenshots are used for limited interface observations and captioned as references. Third-party affiliate pages can reveal search interests, but their claims do not establish a provider’s identity or financial terms.
Every material product claim should connect to an exact source, date and subject. Where those are missing, the page should say that the detail is unverified. Similar branding, a page ranking in search or repeated wording across sites does not replace evidence.
Article review
Articles are checked for clear wording, reliable sources and accurate claims. Draft status is separate from word count. An article remains a draft until its review is complete.
Sachi is the named publisher. The owner supplies a ten-year experience statement, which has not been independently verified. We do not represent that Sachi personally tested a product or reviewed an article unless that review is actually completed and recorded.
Comparisons and search optimisation
Comparison articles use consistent questions and acknowledge gaps rather than manufacture winners. Search optimisation uses distinct page purposes, readable titles, relevant links and descriptive image text. We avoid repeating every target keyword on every page.
A requested word count is a planning constraint rather than a quality claim. We do not append repeated sections to reach a length target. A page that has not met its editorial requirements remains a draft; a topic on the content roadmap is not an already published article.
Request a correction
Email [email protected] with the page address, the sentence in question, a short explanation and a reliable supporting source. Redact private account information. We aim to evaluate substantiated corrections, but no response time or publication outcome is guaranteed.
If an update changes the meaning of an important claim, add a clear correction note. Small spelling and formatting changes need not be presented as new research. An update date should reflect a real edit, not an automatic attempt to make old material look fresh.